Fix possible race condition related to billing an activity
This commit is contained in:
+59
-53
@@ -59,6 +59,42 @@ pub async fn clear_tenant_nwc_error(pubkey: &str) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Insert this period's renewal items and advance the tenant's `renewed_at`
|
||||
/// marker to `period_start`, atomically and idempotently.
|
||||
pub async fn renew_tenant(
|
||||
tenant_pubkey: &str,
|
||||
period_start: i64,
|
||||
items: &[InvoiceItem],
|
||||
) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
with_tx(async |tx| {
|
||||
// Re-read the marker inside the transaction so the guard and the writes
|
||||
// commit together — this ensures idempotency so we don't double-invoice.
|
||||
let renewed_at = sqlx::query_scalar::<_, Option<i64>>(
|
||||
"SELECT renewed_at FROM tenant WHERE pubkey = ?",
|
||||
)
|
||||
.bind(tenant_pubkey)
|
||||
.fetch_one(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
if renewed_at.is_some_and(|at| at >= period_start) {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for item in items {
|
||||
insert_invoice_item_tx(tx, item).await?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sqlx::query("UPDATE tenant SET renewed_at = ? WHERE pubkey = ?")
|
||||
.bind(period_start)
|
||||
.bind(tenant_pubkey)
|
||||
.execute(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
})
|
||||
.await
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// --- Relays ---
|
||||
|
||||
pub async fn create_relay(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
@@ -132,6 +168,10 @@ pub async fn update_relay(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub async fn activate_relay(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
set_relay_status(&relay.id, RELAY_STATUS_ACTIVE, "activate_relay").await
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub async fn deactivate_relay(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
set_relay_status(&relay.id, RELAY_STATUS_INACTIVE, "deactivate_relay").await
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -141,10 +181,6 @@ pub async fn mark_relay_delinquent(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
set_relay_status(&relay.id, RELAY_STATUS_DELINQUENT, "mark_relay_delinquent").await
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub async fn activate_relay(relay: &Relay) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
set_relay_status(&relay.id, RELAY_STATUS_ACTIVE, "activate_relay").await
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
async fn set_relay_status(relay_id: &str, status: &str, activity_type: &str) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
let activity = with_tx(async |tx| {
|
||||
sqlx::query("UPDATE relay SET status = ?, synced = 0 WHERE id = ?")
|
||||
@@ -186,7 +222,7 @@ pub async fn complete_relay_sync(relay_id: &str) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// --- Invoice items (the outstanding-charge ledger) ---
|
||||
// --- Invoice items ---
|
||||
|
||||
/// Persist a reconciled activity's line item and mark the activity billed in one
|
||||
/// transaction, so a recovery pass never re-bills it.
|
||||
@@ -194,8 +230,11 @@ pub async fn insert_invoice_item_for_activity(invoice_item: &InvoiceItem, activi
|
||||
let now = chrono::Utc::now().timestamp();
|
||||
|
||||
with_tx(async |tx| {
|
||||
insert_invoice_item_tx(tx, invoice_item).await?;
|
||||
mark_activity_billed_tx(tx, activity_id, now).await?;
|
||||
// Claim the activity first. If a concurrent reconcile pass already billed
|
||||
// it, the claim no-ops and we skip the item rather than duplicating it.
|
||||
if mark_activity_billed_tx(tx, activity_id, now).await? {
|
||||
insert_invoice_item_tx(tx, invoice_item).await?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
})
|
||||
@@ -207,42 +246,8 @@ pub async fn insert_invoice_item_for_activity(invoice_item: &InvoiceItem, activi
|
||||
pub async fn mark_activity_billed(activity_id: &str) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
let now = chrono::Utc::now().timestamp();
|
||||
|
||||
with_tx(async |tx| mark_activity_billed_tx(tx, activity_id, now).await).await
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Insert this period's renewal items and advance the tenant's `renewed_at`
|
||||
/// marker to `period_start`, atomically. Idempotent: a repeat call for an
|
||||
/// already-renewed period is a no-op, so a crash mid-renewal or a poll racing
|
||||
/// the on-demand endpoint can't bill the same period twice.
|
||||
pub async fn renew_tenant(
|
||||
tenant_pubkey: &str,
|
||||
period_start: i64,
|
||||
items: &[InvoiceItem],
|
||||
) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
with_tx(async |tx| {
|
||||
// Re-read the marker inside the transaction so the guard and the writes
|
||||
// commit together — this is the real idempotency backstop.
|
||||
let renewed_at = sqlx::query_scalar::<_, Option<i64>>(
|
||||
"SELECT renewed_at FROM tenant WHERE pubkey = ?",
|
||||
)
|
||||
.bind(tenant_pubkey)
|
||||
.fetch_one(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
if renewed_at.is_some_and(|at| at >= period_start) {
|
||||
return Ok(());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for item in items {
|
||||
insert_invoice_item_tx(tx, item).await?;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sqlx::query("UPDATE tenant SET renewed_at = ? WHERE pubkey = ?")
|
||||
.bind(period_start)
|
||||
.bind(tenant_pubkey)
|
||||
.execute(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
|
||||
mark_activity_billed_tx(tx, activity_id, now).await?;
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
})
|
||||
.await
|
||||
@@ -250,12 +255,10 @@ pub async fn renew_tenant(
|
||||
|
||||
// --- Invoices ---
|
||||
|
||||
/// Claim all of a tenant's outstanding items onto a new invoice — but only if
|
||||
/// they sum to a positive amount. A non-positive balance (net credit or nothing
|
||||
/// owed) leaves the items outstanding so the credit carries to the next positive
|
||||
/// Claim all of a tenant's outstanding items onto a new invoice. A non-positive
|
||||
/// balance leaves the items outstanding so the credit carries to the next positive
|
||||
/// invoice. Returns the invoice, or `None` when there's nothing to bill.
|
||||
pub async fn claim_outstanding_into_invoice(
|
||||
invoice_id: &str,
|
||||
pub async fn create_invoice(
|
||||
tenant_pubkey: &str,
|
||||
period_start: i64,
|
||||
period_end: i64,
|
||||
@@ -274,13 +277,13 @@ pub async fn claim_outstanding_into_invoice(
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
let invoice =
|
||||
insert_invoice_tx(tx, invoice_id, tenant_pubkey, period_start, period_end).await?;
|
||||
insert_invoice_tx(tx, tenant_pubkey, period_start, period_end).await?;
|
||||
|
||||
sqlx::query(
|
||||
"UPDATE invoice_item SET invoice_id = ?
|
||||
WHERE tenant_pubkey = ? AND invoice_id IS NULL",
|
||||
)
|
||||
.bind(invoice_id)
|
||||
.bind(&invoice.id)
|
||||
.bind(tenant_pubkey)
|
||||
.execute(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
@@ -414,12 +417,12 @@ async fn insert_activity_tx(
|
||||
|
||||
async fn insert_invoice_tx(
|
||||
tx: &mut Transaction<'_, Sqlite>,
|
||||
invoice_id: &str,
|
||||
tenant_pubkey: &str,
|
||||
period_start: i64,
|
||||
period_end: i64,
|
||||
) -> Result<Invoice> {
|
||||
let now = chrono::Utc::now().timestamp();
|
||||
let invoice_id = uuid::Uuid::new_v4().to_string();
|
||||
|
||||
Ok(sqlx::query_as::<_, Invoice>(
|
||||
"INSERT INTO invoice (id, tenant_pubkey, status, period_start, period_end, created_at, updated_at)
|
||||
@@ -455,15 +458,18 @@ async fn insert_invoice_item_tx(tx: &mut Transaction<'_, Sqlite>, item: &Invoice
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/// Claim an activity as billed. Returns `true` if this call set the marker, and
|
||||
/// `false` if it was already set — e.g. a concurrent reconcile pass won the race —
|
||||
/// so callers can skip work that would otherwise double-bill.
|
||||
async fn mark_activity_billed_tx(
|
||||
tx: &mut Transaction<'_, Sqlite>,
|
||||
activity_id: &str,
|
||||
billed_at: i64,
|
||||
) -> Result<()> {
|
||||
sqlx::query("UPDATE activity SET billed_at = ? WHERE id = ?")
|
||||
) -> Result<bool> {
|
||||
let result = sqlx::query("UPDATE activity SET billed_at = ? WHERE id = ? AND billed_at IS NULL")
|
||||
.bind(billed_at)
|
||||
.bind(activity_id)
|
||||
.execute(&mut **tx)
|
||||
.await?;
|
||||
Ok(())
|
||||
Ok(result.rows_affected() > 0)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user