No payment setup enforcement before paid relay creation #28

Closed
opened 2026-04-20 11:40:37 +00:00 by userAdityaa · 2 comments
Contributor
No description provided.
Owner

This is by design — payment is due at the end of the subscription, and users may want to receive DMs and pay invoices manually rather than add nwc or a card. We should definitely encourage them to set up a payment method, but we don't need to require it.

This is by design — payment is due at the end of the subscription, and users may want to receive DMs and pay invoices manually rather than add nwc or a card. We should definitely _encourage_ them to set up a payment method, but we don't need to require it.
Author
Contributor

Yes, it felt like a design choice, I opened the issue to get your feedback here. I am closing both issues and but raising a PR that encourages payment setup for paid relays without making it a strict requirement in the general UX flow.

Yes, it felt like a design choice, I opened the issue to get your feedback here. I am closing both issues and but raising a PR that encourages payment setup for paid relays without making it a strict requirement in the general UX flow.
Sign in to join this conversation.
No Label
2 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: coracle/caravel#28