Fix channel loading
This commit is contained in:
+9
-14
@@ -163,18 +163,16 @@ export const pullConservatively = ({relays, filters}: AppSyncOpts) => {
|
||||
const [smart, dumb] = partition(hasNegentropy, relays)
|
||||
const promises = [pull({relays: smart, filters})]
|
||||
|
||||
// Since pulling from relays without negentropy is expensive, only do it 30% of the time,
|
||||
// unless we have very few matching events. If that's the case, either we haven't synced
|
||||
// this filter yet, or there are few enough events that we don't really need to worry about
|
||||
// downloading duplicates. Otherwise, add a reasonable since value to make sure we at
|
||||
// least fetch recent events.
|
||||
if (Math.random() > 0.7 || repository.query(filters).length < 100) {
|
||||
promises.push(pull({relays: dumb, filters}))
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Since pulling from relays without negentropy is expensive, limit how many
|
||||
// duplicates we repeatedly download
|
||||
if (dumb.length > 0) {
|
||||
const events = sortBy(e => -e.created_at, repository.query(filters))
|
||||
const since = events[50]!.created_at
|
||||
|
||||
promises.push(pull({relays: dumb, filters: filters.map(assoc("since", since))}))
|
||||
if (events.length > 100) {
|
||||
filters = filters.map(assoc('since', events[100]!.created_at))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
promises.push(pull({relays: dumb, filters}))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return Promise.all(promises)
|
||||
@@ -326,11 +324,8 @@ export const {
|
||||
getKey: channel => channel.id,
|
||||
load: (id: string, request: Partial<SubscribeRequestWithHandlers> = {}) => {
|
||||
const [url, room] = splitChannelId(id)
|
||||
const channel = get(channelsById).get(id)
|
||||
const timestamps = channel?.messages.map(m => m.event.created_at) || []
|
||||
const since = Math.max(0, max(timestamps) - 3600)
|
||||
|
||||
return load({...request, relays: [url], filters: [{"#~": [room], since}]})
|
||||
return load({...request, relays: [url], filters: [{"#~": [room]}]})
|
||||
},
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user