#135
This PR adds basic video functionality to our voice rooms. Again I followed the Discord UX for inspiration, so all video calls start as voice-only calls that gracefully upgrade (and downgrade) when someone turns on a video or starts screen sharing.
When a video feed is detected the Room page will change to display a grid of feeds. The grid logic is very basic, that's definitely an area to improve in the future. You can open the chat part of the room with a new button on the VoiceWidget - on the desktop layout this creates a split view with video on the left and chat on the right, but on mobile it switches to chat fullscreen. I also added a little pin icon you can use to focus on a single video feed (useful for screen sharing). There is a lot of tailwind I don't understand here, but it seems to work well enough.
I moved voice.ts into a new `call` folder and moved some of its stores into `call/stores.ts` which allowed me to keep most of the video logic in `call/video.ts`. It's not a perfect encapsulation as voice.ts does subscribe to some of the hooks for the livekit calls and passes some of the signals onto `video.ts`. This could probably be broken up better but for this PR I'd rather not focus on making it perfect if that's ok. Partly for the sake of time but also because I envision another PR that renames/reorganizes things and I think a larger UX evaluation is necessary and should include real user feedback. I'm not confident tha""t the Voice Room concept as a whole will stick going forward. Maybe all rooms in a livekit enabled server should be able to host a call (like a slack huddle), maybe users want to be able to schedule calls as events, or even have them start with an ad-hoc set of participants completely outside of a NIP-29 group, etc.
Co-authored-by: mplorentz <mplorentz@noreply.gitea.coracle.social>
Reviewed-on: #135
Co-authored-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
Co-committed-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
After using the voice rooms more since we removed the option for voice-only rooms I think you were right to suggest a dialog box before joining rooms. It felt far to clunky to have to join the voice call any time you just wanted to try to view room members, edit room settings, or just view the recent text chat.
This adds a dialog that allows the user to decline to join the call but still access the text part of the room along with associated settings and controls. It also acts as another confirmation step before turning on the user's microphone, and allows them to choose an audio input so they don't have to mess with the (generally terrible) browser controls for doing so. We should probably have controls to change your audio input and output from within the call as well, but I think this is enough for an MVP.
Co-authored-by: mplorentz <mplorentz@noreply.gitea.coracle.social>
Reviewed-on: #109
Co-authored-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
Co-committed-by: Matt Lorentz <mplorentz@noreply.coracle.social>
Jon Staab
userAdityaa
Khushvendra
Jon Staab
priyanshu_bharti
mplorentz
theAnuragMishra
hodlbod
junaiddshaukat